The Comedy of Justice: Jack Smith's J6 Case Against Trump Reaches New Heights of Absurdity – Flopping Aces

Just when you thought Jack Smith’s J6 case against Donald Trump couldn’t get any more laughable–it just did.

In one week, SCOTUS will hear arguments on DOJ’s (ab)use of 1512c2, post Enron document shredding “obstruction of an official proceeding” statute passed in 2002.

My longtime followers know I’ve covered this issue for 3+ years. More than 330 J6ers and Trump have been charged with this felony obstruction count–now SCOTUS has a chance to right an horrific wrong that has destroyed (and ended) lives as this ruthless DOJ intentionally misinterprets the law to criminalize political dissent.

DOJ’s use of the law barely survived 2 appellate challenges. Thank you Judge Flo Pan, Biden appointee and wife of Dem Party activist Max Stier, for being the deciding vote in both 2-1 decisions!

Now her opinion faces long-awaited SCOTUS scrutiny. 

If SCOTUS reverses how DOJ has applied 1512c2–and most observers even on the left expect the court will–the decision would gut Smith’s J6 indictment. 2 of 4 counts involve 1512c2.

BUT–Jack (9-0 SCOTUS) Smith now claims even if SCOTUS overturns DOJ application of 1512c2, those related counts in his Trump indictment will stand.