in

Three Justices Dissented in Landmark Censorship Case — Here’s What They Said and Why It Matters

The Biden administration’s coercive censorship of social media — as exposed in the Murthy v. Missouri case — was “blatantly unconstitutional, and the country may come to regret the Court’s failure to say so,” according to dissenting Supreme Court Justices Samuel A. Alito Jr., Clarence Thomas and Neil M. Gorsuch.

This post was created with our nice and easy submission form. Create your post!

Comments

Loading…

What do you think?

Posted by Chris10

Supreme Court Hands Huge Defeat To Jan. 6 Prosecutors: “Improperly Charged Hundreds of Jan. 6 Protesters”

One of Justice Coney Barrett's 4 Clerks Tied to Newsguard, Key Parts of Biden Censorship Complex, MURTHY DECISION CONFLICT OF INTEREST | The Gateway Pundit | by Benjamin Wetmore