in ,

Tucker: New Bill to Restrict TikTok Actually Gives Gov’t Power to Control Speech

“So you would be allowing the executive branch, the Biden administration, to regulate speech on the internet, and if you are somehow involved with a ‘foreign adversary’…you go to prison for 20 years…this is about introducing flat-out totalitarianism.” —Tucker Carlson on the RESTRICT Act

Many people have hailed the RESTRICT Actnow in the Senate as a potential boon, since it supposedly aims to ban risky foreign transactions and apps; or, as the bill puts it, “To authorize the Secretary of Commerce to review and prohibit certain transactions between persons in the United States and foreign adversaries, and for other purposes.” The senator who introduced the bill, Mark Warner (D-VA), has endorsed targeting TikTok in particular. So far, so good—TikTok is owned by ByteDance, in which the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) owns a financial stake and board seatand all Chinese companies are required to spy for the CCP, so it should be bannedThe issue is that the RESTRICT App would give the federal government unprecedented power to control speech online, according to Fox’s Tucker Carlson.

The “covered holdings” that can be targeted in the bill as posing “undue or unacceptable risk” could be defined as violating the act even if they’re not foreign, it seems to me (see Section 2, definitions, point B of “COVERED HOLDING”). The Secretary of Commerce decides what is and what is not a risk. Remember when Parler was shut down for supposedly helping incite insurrection?

Under this bill, if you engage in any of that with a so-called ‘foreign adversary,’ as determined by, in this case, the Biden administration, that would allow the Secretary of Commerce…and the Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines to decide whether you’re acting in the ‘interest of a foreign adversary.’ Again, that’s another term that the executive branch, the Secretary of Commerce, gets to define without the interference of Congress.”

Penalties can include 20-year prison sentences for American citizens determined to have violated the Act

This post was created with our nice and easy submission form. Create your post!



What do you think?

Posted by CatSalgado32

Catherine Salgado is a columnist for The Rogue Review, a Writer for MRC Free Speech America, and writes her own Substack, Pro Deo et Libertate. She received the Andrew Breitbart MVP award for August 2021 from The Rogue Review for her journalism.

Sam Bankman-Fried charged in US for bribing Chinese officials

The Mentally Ill “Shouldn’t Own Guns,” How About “Trans” People? –