Why the Trump SCOTUS victory is bigger than it looks – Flopping Aces

While the justices did not venture into an opinion as to what merits may exist vis-à-vis presidential culpability in a January 6 insurrection claim, it is nonetheless a Supreme Court opinion stemming from an appeal over just that assertion.  Since President Trump cannot be proven culpable under standards of actual evidence (the left’s fallacy of assertion is not evidence of proof, which is why leftists have been obsessed with “intent”), nor can an insurrection itself be defined and proven (versus mere trespass), the entire fraudulent January 6 DNC program is effectively dead.

Contrary to mainstream media assertions, the Supreme Court did not just make a simple technical ruling: it was obligated to contemplate the entirety of the appellate case, while pushing the issue of Article 3 evidence, effectively beyond state partisan electoral tactics, and into broader congressional territory, while preserving judicial review as a further, albeit imperfect safeguard.

That won’t stop the DNC (which is the actual plaintiff) from continuing to wage lawfare against Trump, of course, or anyone else — or from trying to stack the Supreme Court by any means possible, or to eradicate the electoral college through back-door legislation, for example.  But much more fascinating is why such legal abuses continue to be the DNC’s primary tool for advancing its agenda.  Why use the legal system?  Why doesn’t the DNC simply field a competent, more moderate, candidate?

Because a capable, competent candidate undermines their radical agenda, which is so extreme that only a fully controlled proxy president could remain necessarily ignorant of the left’s fundamental violations of constitutional law, including, most centrally, acting explicitly against the national security interests of the United States.