European Parliament Votes to Confront Muslim Brotherhood Networks
⚡🇪🇺🇬🇷 Greek MEP Afroditi Latinopoulou:
“Europe has become unrecognizable, filled with Mohammeds and Mahmouds who hate us in the name of Allah.
Socialists want to Islamize Europe.
We need to stop the subsidies now and deport them all!” https://t.co/jqJz4RiEPu— Adam Moczar (@AdamMoczar) October 15, 2026
Entryism, in this context, means the quiet effort by organized Islamist groups to gain influence inside European institutions, charities, youth organizations, schools, and political circles. They often use the language of human rights, diversity, and anti-discrimination while advancing a political project that treats religious rules as superior to equal rights under the law, free speech, and equality between men and women. French MEP Céline Imart of the center-right European People’s Party sponsored the text and called the result a historic first for the Parliament.
The European Parliament passed a resolution calling for a coordinated strategy against what lawmakers describe as “Islamist entryism” and the influence of Muslim Brotherhood networks. The measure cleared by 381 votes to 167, with 15 abstentions.
The European Parliament calls for the Muslim Brotherhood to be added to the Terror list. https://t.co/NynXQQye4a
— Kosher (@koshercockney) October 8, 2026
The resolution is not a binding law. It is a political demand aimed at the European Commission and the Council of the European Union. It asks for a shared method to identify the patterns: mixing religion and politics, opaque funding, recurring partnerships with known networks, and groups that reappear under new names after earlier scrutiny. It specifically flags the need for tighter checks on EU money going to organizations suspected of Brotherhood links. Lawmakers want a full overview of such funding, including intermediate grants that hide the final recipients. Named examples in related reporting include the Forum of European Muslim Youth and Student Organisations (FEMYSO) and the European Network Against Racism.
The left wing parties of European nations stand with the Muslim Brotherhood in the EU parliament. https://t.co/JtWpnlt1TA
— Don’t Listen to words. Watch their actions. (@wakeuptotheleft) September 18, 2026
It also directs the Council to examine whether Brotherhood-linked individuals and entities meet the legal criteria for the EU terrorist list. That review is meant to look past formal membership to front groups, financial channels, youth networks, and people in leadership roles. Additional points include closer scrutiny of foreign funding tied to actors in Qatar and Turkey, tighter visa and cross-border tools with Europol and Eurojust, and limits on institutional access for groups such as FEMYSO. The text supports national measures against full-face coverings in public on grounds of security, social cohesion, and women’s rights. At the same time it states that ordinary Muslims must be protected from discrimination and that political Islamism should not be treated as the voice of the religion itself.
The vote followed a clear left-right split. Center-right, conservative, and some centrist groups supplied the majority. Socialists, Greens, and the far left largely opposed it; Imart noted that socialist and far-left lawmakers boycotted negotiations. Critics, including FEMYSO and allied civil-society networks, called the resolution discriminatory and an attack on Muslim organizations working on anti-racism and youth issues. Security analysts and conservative MEPs described it as the first formal parliamentary recognition that organized Islamist networks have used European democratic tools and funding streams to expand influence.
Imagine losing a war without a single bullet being fired.
Spain is back in pre Sacra Reconquista situation. Spain is already back on the Al-Andalus.On October 8, 2026, the European Parliament adopted a resolution calling for a coordinated EU strategy to counter Islamist entryism and the influence of Muslim Brotherhood-linked networks.
The resolution passed with 381 votes in favor, 167 against and 15 abstentions. Most national delegations of MEPs supported the proposal, while Spain and Finland stood out as the only countries where a majority voted against it.
The Muslim Brotherhood was founded in Egypt in 1928 and has since developed into a broader Islamist movement with affiliated or ideologically connected organizations in several countries.
The resolution focuses on what lawmakers describe as Islamist entryism, referring to attempts by Islamist networks to gain influence within political institutions, civil society organizations and other established structures.
It calls for greater scrutiny of EU funding, closer monitoring of related networks and an assessment of whether certain linked individuals or organizations should be considered for the EU terrorist list.
Importantly, the resolution is non-binding. It does not ban the Muslim Brotherhood or automatically designate any organization as terrorist.
The vote signals substantial support within the European Parliament for closer examination of these networks, although the proposed measures would require further action by EU institutions.
— Imtiaz Mahmood (@ImtiazMadmood) October 11, 2026
The move sits against a wider backdrop. In late 2025 the Trump administration issued an executive order directing a review of certain Muslim Brotherhood chapters, and in January 2026 the United States designated the Lebanese, Egyptian, and Jordanian branches as terrorist organizations or specially designated global terrorists, citing support for Hamas and related activity. Several European countries have produced national reports documenting Brotherhood-linked associations, schools, and funding. France, Austria, and the Netherlands have taken or proposed stronger national steps.
Imart has said the vote breaks a long taboo and that institutions can no longer treat certain networks as neutral partners. She has pledged to keep pressing for follow-through. Because the resolution is non-binding, real effect depends on the Commission producing the funding review and the Council deciding whether any listings meet the legal threshold. For now it is a documented signal that a majority of the Parliament is willing to name the networks and the methods rather than treat every criticism as an attack on Muslims as a whole.
The same pattern of influence through civil-society groups, funding opacity, and institutional access appears in broader debates over immigration, free speech, and security that shape Western politics. Whatfinger News continues to track those developments at our military and security desk.
— The Whatfinger News Team: Alex and Beth, with Grok on edits
Top Features and Vids across Whatfinger
- “Mountains Of Evidence” Ilhan Omar IS COOKED, Obama Comes To her DEFENSE
- AOC Brutally Mocked For Latest Stunt As She’s In Full Blown Panic
- He just watched the ad and it was BRUTAL. James O’Keefe exposed Abdul
- Nobody on welfare should be voting. I said it – The stats on Cali will shock you. Fast clip
- This is the horrifying moment when Catholic priest was flattened by a crucifix during a service
- Bones, carved marks, and a drowned plain keep forcing the same question: how early did people start organizing, building, and recording things that look a lot like civilization?
